Prose compares Angelou’s
writing to malpractice in order to convince readers that schools are promoting
“trash and semi-trash” instead of quality literature. Doctors convicted of malpractice would never
be entrusted with the education of medical students because they would teach
ineffective medical practices. Prose
argues that teaching Angelou’s book is the same type of inappropriate modeling
because “many of the terrible mysteries” found in college students’ writing
stem from the imprecise usage of language they read in Angelou’s text. Though the comparison may seem far-fetched,
Prose must over-exaggerate her claim to criticize a beloved American
author. Readers’ instincts are to
protect and defend authors they are familiar with, but by using examples that
reveal Angelou’s “opaque prose,” readers are convinced that Angelou is not the
best model of clear writing. Prose draws
a connection between what students read and how they write to criticize the
choices made by schools and blame educators for the current state of bad
writing.
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment