Warm-up:
SUse your TASS book to determine the pattern of each
sentence and explain why it fits that pattern.
S1. Why so many
students dread returning to school is a mystery to me.
S2. Not only did
your summer work teach you to argue, but also it taught you to style your
sentences effectively.
Classwork: go over the Thank You for Arguing Quiz, have students revise their Art of Styling Sentences Quiz. In order to earn back a point for each incorrect response they must select the correct answer, explain why it is more correct, and write an original sentence in that pattern. Explain homework and give students an opportunity to start.
Homework: Due Thursday
Directions: Reread
pp. 6-21 in
The Art of Styling Sentences. For sentence patterns 1, 2, 3, and 4 (not 4a),
choose at least TEN of the “Professional Examples” sentences to work with.
For each “Professional Example,”
1)
Briefly
explain WHY the sentence is an example of the particular pattern.
2)
Then, consider what Heinrichs might say about
this sentence. Does it seem to use
ethos, logos, and/or pathos? If so, what type, and how? Does it appeal to values,
assign blame, or call for the audience to make a choice? What other rhetorical
tricks or strategies seem to be present in this sentence? Is the sentence an argument or part of an
argument of some kind? If so, what does
the author seem to WANT from his or her audience?
Example: “It made no
sense to anyone; it was just style.” SF Chronicle
1)
This sentence is an example of a compound
sentence without a conjunction because it consists of two complete thoughts
with only a semicolon joining them.
2)
Heinrichs might say that the journalist who
wrote this sentence was using ordinary language and clear sentence structure to
establish his ethos as a direct, plain communicator who is communicating sense
without unnecessary style. He is also using the word “style,” which has both
negative and positive connotations, to assign blame to the speech or text he is
criticizing. If something is done with
style, that typically implies it was done with grace, finesse, and flair, but something
done with “just” style means it lacks substance, or sense. We Americans may
like style, but we also value speakers and writers who seem to communicate
common, plain old sense. This writer seems to want the audience to condemn and
dismiss the text or speaker he is criticizing.